CHRISTIAN MEDIA RESEARCH - Exposing apostacy and more within the Christian church

HOME   |   SNAPSHOTS   |   NEWSLETTERS   |   CONTACT US



Major Prophets Who Missed


ot only are prophets not stoned for failed prophecies, there are several examples of respected prophets that are not even reproached for prophetic predictions that did not come to pass. The most notable example, of course, is Jonah. This highly visible seer prophesied against Nineveh with "yet 40 days and Nineveh shall be overthrown." 22 While the text tells us that Jonah had other successful prophesies, 23 in this case Nineveh repented and the Lord chose to turn back his wrath against the Assyrian capital - yet nowhere do we read of Jonah having been accused of being a false prophet.

     Apparently, the sovereignty of God supercedes his instructions to a prophet to speak his words. In the case of Jonah, the text clearly says that the Lord instructed Jonah to "go to Nineveh, that great city, and cry against it...." 24 Even though Jonah resisted his prophetic calling, he ultimately obeyed the Lord. The act of obedience to the prophetic call is also a pattern that repeats itself, as we shall see.

     In yet another example of a prophecy that was not obviously fulfilled, we see the widely known prediction of Daniel's 70 weeks. In Daniel 9, the prophet says that "from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem, unto the Messiah the prince shall be seven weeks and threescore and two weeks." 25

     While prophecy commentators have been routinely teaching for over a century that everyone in ancient Israel "knew" that a prophetic "week" is actually a period of seven years, there is not one verse in the Bible that actually says that! Indeed, the literal rendering of 69 weeks elapsing between the commandment to restore Jerusalem and the coming of Messiah should be preferred - unless there is some overriding statement in the scriptures to the contrary.

     While I actually do hold to the premise of a prophetic "week" being a period of 7 years, that's beside the point. Since it cannot be demonstrated in scripture that this was always the case whenever a "week" was being mentioned, about 16 1/2 months (70 literal weeks) after Daniel's prophesied "commandment to restore and rebuild Jerusalem," the Jews would have expected their Messiah. Of course, Jesus didn't come 70 weeks after that prophesied edict to rebuild the city and the temple. He came almost 500 years later.

     Many are aware that the usual interpretation of this prophetic "week" makes each 7 day week into a 7 year period - which then calculates 70 weeks out to 490 years. I also hold this view, but many that do not could plausibly accuse Daniel of having issued a false prophecy. The truth of the prophecy is based on the perspective of time, and how we interpret the times spoken by the prophet. There is yet another example of major prophets in the Bible that have issued a time-based prophecy that did not occur within the specified period.

     In Jerusalem, at the actual fall of the Assyrian empire about 150 years after Jonah's inaccurate prophecy, we find another failed prediction by a prophet of the Lord. Incredibly, the major prophet Isaiah issued a specific prophecy that was not fulfilled in the way it was stated.

     In II Kings, we read how "In those days was Hezekiah sick unto death. And the prophet Isaiah the son of Amoz came to him, and said unto him, Thus saith the Lord, Set thine house in order; for thou shalt die, and not live." 26 In this instance, it's clear the prophet is stating the illness would take Hezekiah - yet after the good king sought the Lord with tears, God decides to "add unto thy days fifteen years...." 27 Furthermore, the text tells us that Hezekiah "recovered" from the illness that Isaiah prophesied would kill him. Once again, the sovereignty of God intervenes in a course that was pronounced by one of His prophets.

     Here is a point blank example of a "thus saith the Lord" prophecy that failed to be fulfilled--by no less a prophet than Isaiah. There is not a verse in the Bible that lays any charge of false prophet to Isaiah. Indeed, Isaiah is highly revered for his many messianic prophecies - several of which were cited by Jesus Christ himself.

     Similarly, nowhere is Jonah seen to be executed, or even reviled or rebuked, for his failed prophecy. It would seem then, that the Israelites knew that the acts of a false prophet were those specified by Moses as leading the people towards other gods - and clearly neither Jonah, Daniel, nor Isaiah did that.

     It's significant to note that in all three cases, the failed prophecies were focused on timing. Nineveh was later destroyed, and obviously Hezekiah eventually died - the timing was the only aspect of the prophecies that seemed to be in question.

     It's worth noting that even in the Deuteronomy passage concerning the Messiah/Prophet the text says "if the thing follow not...." 28 the prophecy is then seen to be false. In every case I've just mentioned, the thing did "follow" at a later time than the prophecy precisely stated. Thus, it would seem that a true prophet of the Lord will ultimately be vindicated through the eventual fulfillment of every prophecy, but not necessarily within the immediate time frame.

     It's also interesting to see that even the scriptural exhortation to kill the prophets that led the people to worship other gods was not followed to the letter - even in the Old Testament times. For example, in Exodus the Lord appoints Aaron to be a prophet when he says to Moses, "and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet." 29 Yet in the provocation in the wilderness, it is Aaron who is deeply implicated as he told the Israelites to "...break off the golden earrings" that he subsequently "fashioned it with a graving tool, after he had made it a golden calf." 30 Although the text tells us it was the Israelites themselves that put him up to it, clearly the idolatrous golden calf was worshiped and we see no outright penalty against Aaron for his part in it.

     While one could argue that Aaron was actually a prophet of Moses, as opposed to a prophet of the Lord, it seems rather evident that the office of prophet was frequently given a rather wide berth when it came to transgressions of the law.

   

Touch Not Mine Anointed

   

s we study the role and power of the prophet, we do see a principle that seems to validate the concept of not opposing the anointed of the Lord - be he prophet, priest, or king. In the book of Numbers, we see that when Miriam the prophetess spoke against Moses, she ran into some dire consequences at the hand of the Lord. The text says that "Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married." 31

     Miriam, who was Aaron's sister, seems to get the worse of it as they confront Moses: "And they said, hath the Lord indeed spoken only by Moses? hath he not spoken also by us?" 32 The Bible tells us the Lord was angered by this, and intervened miraculously to punish the errant duo. The text says "Miriam became leprous, white as snow." 33 Once again, Aaron gets away without severe repercussions as he beseeches Moses to forgive them. Miriam is subsequently healed in this most enlightening episode.

     The tale gives us important details about the office of prophet in contrast to the role of special mediator and servant of the Lord - seen in the form of Moses. Before the Lord strikes Miriam with leprosy, he tells Moses, Aaron, and Miriam some interesting things about prophecy:

"And he said, hear now my words: if there be a prophet among you, I the Lord will make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a dream. My servant Moses is not so, who is faithful in all mine house. With him will I speak mouth to mouth, even apparently, and not in dark speeches; and the similitude of the Lord shall he behold: wherefore then were ye not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?" 34

     Here we see Moses enjoys a special status - foreshadowing the special role of Christ as the mediator of the new covenant. We further see the concept of the "fear of the Lord" with Moses enjoying the blessings of God to such a degree that he represented the Lord to the people - thus transferring the fear of the Lord to the fear of His representative. In this episode, the Lord actually becomes angry that Aaron and Miriam did not fear Moses. This again relates to the statement of not being "afraid" of the prophet whose prediction has failed in Deuteronomy 18.

     The concept of fearing a prophet (or not being afraid of a false prophet) has several scriptures that support it. In the era of the kings, an unnamed prophet opposed King Jeroboam. This prophet, led by the Lord, cried out against an altar Jeroboam had made, prophesying that people would be sacrificed on that altar. While "Jeroboam stood by the altar to burn incense...he put forth his hand from the altar...and his hand, which he put forth against him, dried up, so that he could not pull it again to him." 35 This kind of power quickly instills respect and fear.

     The balance of this particular episode has an even larger lesson concerning prophets. Naturally king Jeroboam begs the prophet to seek the Lord on his behalf so he can regain the use of his hand. After the prophet asks the Lord to restore Jeroboam's hand, which He does, the king asks the prophet to come home with him to receive a reward and some food. The prophet responds that "For so it was charged me by the word of the Lord, saying, Eat no bread, nor drink water, nor turn again by the same way that thou camest." 36 Thus, the prophet leaves the king to go home through another route.

     I can't improve on the Word of God, so I'll let the writer of I Kings tell the balance of the tale:

"Now there dwelt an old prophet in Beth-el; and his sons came and told him all the works that the man of God had done that day...And their father said unto them, What way went he? And went after the man of God, and found him sitting under an oak...And he said unto him, Come home with me, and eat bread. And he said, I may not return with thee, nor go in with thee: neither will I eat bread nor drink water with thee in this place: For it was said to me by the word of the Lord, Thou shalt eat no bread, nor drink water there...He said unto him, I am a prophet also as thou art; and an angel spake unto me by the word of the Lord, saying Bring him back with thee, into thine house, that he may eat bread and drink water. But he lied unto him."

"So he went back with him, and did eat bread in his house, and drank water. And it came to pass, as they sat at the table, that the word of the Lord came unto the prophet that brought him back: And he cried unto the man of God that came from Judah, Forasmuch as thou hast disobeyed the mouth of the Lord...thy carcase shall not come unto the sepulchre of thy fathers. And it came to pass, after he had eaten bread, and after he had drunk, that he saddled for him the ass, to wit, for the prophet whom he had brought back. And when he was gone, a lion met him by the way, and slew him: and his carcase was cast in the way, and the ass stood by it, the lion also stood by the carcase." 37

     In this rather ironic story, the old prophet that lied to the prophet from Judah grieves for the dead prophet and later places him in his own grave. The powerful prophet that confronted king Jeroboam dies miserably, eaten by a lion. While the obvious lesson firmly indicates it's not a good idea to simply believe someone that recounts how he received angelic instructions that run contrary to the established word you've already received from the Lord, it also demonstrates that the Lord takes obedience very seriously. Even when it seems to be unnecessary to follow His instructions, he expects them to be followed to the letter - at least according to this particular scripture.

2002 CHRISTIAN MEDIA RESEARCH, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


PREVIOUS PAGE   NEXT PAGE



Top of Page | Back to Doctrines Index


ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2000-2010 CHRISTIAN MEDIA RESEARCH